<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Powersox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geargals.net/tag/powersox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geargals.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>APF Powersox Ski Socks</title>
		<link>http://geargals.net/2009/03/18/apf-powersox-ski-socks/</link>
		<comments>http://geargals.net/2009/03/18/apf-powersox-ski-socks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geargals</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Technical Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powersox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geargals.wordpress.com/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[Yes. I know this is not a picture of ski socks. But this is the best I can do. Imagine the socks pictured above, only with about a foot more sock above it, and there you have the socks I tried. -HG]
Why do socks need to be left foot-right foot specific? I don&#8217;t know, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/albums/gg154/geargals/Powersox/?action=view&amp;current=PowerSoxAPFloRider.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg154/geargals/Powersox/PowerSoxAPFloRider.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a></p>
<p><em>[Yes. I know this is not a picture of ski socks. But this is the best I can do. Imagine the socks pictured above, only with about a foot more sock above it, and there you have the socks I tried. -HG]</em></p>
<p>Why do socks need to be left foot-right foot specific? I don&#8217;t know, but it certainly seems to help. These ski socks, while adding a level of difficulty to getting dressed in the morning, really are noticeably more comfortable than unifoot socks. They stay secure on your foot and don&#8217;t twist or shift. I don&#8217;t know about the idea that they are supposed to give your foot more support, because I pretty much just shove them into ski boots and believe me, those ski boots give me all the support I need. I do like the extra padding (but not too much!) on the uppers, and the gentle-ish elastic at the tops. They seem to have pretty good wicking power and stay comfortable even after a full day in ski boots.</p>
<p>Fit was pretty good, although I found the socks just a tad too long for my wee little legs, and I have taken to folding them over on the top so they don&#8217;t cut into the backs of my knees. That doesn&#8217;t seem to affect the performance or fit of the socks; they don&#8217;t shift or slide down. Because of this issue and the fact that the foot is a little long, they seem to be sized just a tad large, so if smaller sizes are available they&#8217;re the ones to go for.</p>
<p>As ski socks, these are one of the two pair I consistently reach for and have been known to wear even if they are dirty (a sign of high esteem indeed)! I&#8217;m keen to try the running and cycling socks from Powersox &#8211; if they can make ski socks that don&#8217;t shift, the running socks must be phenomenal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geargals.net/2009/03/18/apf-powersox-ski-socks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
